| Sound News | Press Releases | Archives | Week In Review | Editorials | Articles |
| Reviews | Benchmarks | Interviews | FAQs |Files & Drivers |
| Early Impressions | Game Guide | Search | Links | Forum | Contacts | ADS |



title_3dss.gif (30276 bytes)
dot_yellowish.gif (35 bytes)

A question you want answered? Let us know and we will do our best to get you the answer.

dot_yellowish.gif (35 bytes)

Please support 3DsoundSurge by visiting our sponsors
dot_yellowish.gif (35 bytes)
dot_yellowish.gif (35 bytes)

 


3DsoundSurge FAQ Manager Version 1.0
  • F.A.Q: Aureal Technology FAQ

    All about Aureal's technology including the APIs (A3D 1.0, 2.0, 3.0), sound cards, chips (including the Vortex 2 and Motorola DSP), speakers and anything else you can think of with respect to Aureal's technology. For support questions check out our support FAQ.


    24. GENERAL: Why do Vortex 2-based cards use more CPU time than the SB Live? - Top

    The first is in regards to the Ziff Davis 3D Audio Benchmarks. With Aureal's latest reference drivers, Vortex 2-based products will benchmark with approximately the same performance or slightly better performance as the SB Live! when the number of channels is 16 or lower in 4 speaker mode or even with 32 channels in 2 speaker or headphone mode. In four speaker mode the numbers get very different when 32 3D streams are used. This is because the SB Live! currently supports 32 3D audio streams in hardware, whereas the Vortex 2-based products do not when 4 speakers are enabled. For example of benchmarking results comparing the Vortex 2 to other sound cards you can check out our ZD Audio Benchmark page.

    The second way to answer this question is in regards to A3D 2.0 games. Aureal’s new wavetracing technology takes the geometry of the room passed to the graphics adapter, and parses it into useful data that our audio engine can use to render realistic reflections and occlusions. While much of this is done on the Vortex 2 hardware, some computational work is done by the host. Aureal is committed to reducing the amount of CPU time needed. They have already made improvements and will continue to optimize where they can to produce the best sounding audio with the least possible host usage. They will also work closely with game developers to help them optimize their code in regards to A3D 2.0. Their goal is for minimal CPU usage when our geometry engine is used. You can see the results of this progress in our A3D 2.0 Performance Article.
    - Updated: November 29, 1999

    [e-Mail me the FAQs] - [Search our FAQs] - [Question Not Answered?]




  • dot_yellowish.gif (35 bytes)

    3dss_small.gif (2549 bytes)All content, design and work is © 2001 - 3D Sound Surge Please respect the copyrights of the articles and writers herein. All copyrights are enforced by 3DSS.  
    View the 3DsoundSurge Privacy Statement

    dot_yellowish.gif (35 bytes)